Walker v. Krol

Opinion

1 2 3 6 7 JEFFREY E. WALKER, Case No. 15-cv-05819-HSG 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON 9 v. APPEAL 10 KROL, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 70 11 Defendants. 12

13 Pursuant to the December 16, 2024 referral notice from the United States Court of Appeals 14 for the Ninth Circuit, Dkt. No. 70, the Court finds that the appeal is frivolous. On September 12, 3 15 || 2024, ina reasoned order and following supplemental briefing, the Court denied Plaintiffs request a 16 || to reopen this action four years after its closure. Dkt. No. 66. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 17 || on appeal is therefore DENIED and Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is REVOKED. See 28 18 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). This case 19 remains closed. The Clerk shall transmit a copy of this order to the Court of Appeals. 20 This order terminates Dkt. No. 70. 22 Dated: 1/6/2025 23 Aleipernl 5 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 25 26 27 28