Walker v. King

Mississippi Supreme Court

Walker v. King

2 Miss. 17

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1834·Published

Opinion

[18]*18By the Court,

Smith, Justice.

Four cases of error have been assigned, but looking into the record we find that their foundation is entirely swept away by the waiver on record of the party suing out this writ of error. It is stated in the record that the parties came by their attorneys, and that the defendant waives all service of writ, pleading, &c. The party is wholly estopped by his own act appearing of record.

Judgment below affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[18]*18By the Court,

Smith, Justice.

Four cases of error have been assigned, but looking into the record we find that their foundation is entirely swept away by the waiver on record of the party suing out this writ of error. It is stated in the record that the parties came by their attorneys, and that the defendant waives all service of writ, pleading, &c. The party is wholly estopped by his own act appearing of record.

Judgment below affirmed.

Walker v. King, 2 Miss. 17 (Mich. 1834).

Pincite

2 Miss. 17 (Walker v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.