Walker v. Johnson

New York Supreme Court

Walker v. Johnson

7 Hill & Den. 387

DecidedDecember 15, 1844

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Hill & Den. 387 (Walker v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. Johnson, 7 Hill & Den. 387 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor and Senators Lott and Putnam

delivered opinions in favor of affirming the judgment of the supreme court, and Senators Bockee, Clark, Jones, Rhoades and Wright, in favor of reversing it. And

On the question being put “ Shall this judgment be reversed?” the members of the court voted as follows:

For reversal: Senators Backus, Bockee, Burnham, Clark, Faulkner, Johnson, Jones, Platt, Rhoades, Scott and Wright—11.

[388]*388For affirmance: The Chancellor and Senators Bart-lit, Denniston, Lawrence, Lester, Lott, Mitchell, Putnam, Smith, Strong and Works—11.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor and Senators Lott and Putnam

delivered opinions in favor of affirming the judgment of the supreme court, and Senators Bockee, Clark, Jones, Rhoades and Wright, in favor of reversing it. And

On the question being put “ Shall this judgment be reversed?” the members of the court voted as follows:

For reversal: Senators Backus, Bockee, Burnham, Clark, Faulkner, Johnson, Jones, Platt, Rhoades, Scott and Wright—11.

[388]*388For affirmance: The Chancellor and Senators Bart-lit, Denniston, Lawrence, Lester, Lott, Mitchell, Putnam, Smith, Strong and Works—11.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Hill & Den. 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-johnson-nysupct-1844.