Walker v. Jacobs
This text of 100 Okla. 277 (Walker v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This is an appeal from the district court of Hughes county. The plaintiffs in error filed their brief November 24, 1922. No brief has been filed by the defendant in error and no extension of time has been given to file same, and no reason has been assigned by the defendant in error as to why it has not filed brief. The brief of the plaintiffs in error appears [278]*278to reasonably sustain tbe assignments of error, and under tbe rule of tbis court, tbe rec. rd will not be searched to find some theory upon wbicb tbe judgment of tbe lower court may be sustained.
Tbe judgment of tbe’ lower court is reversed.
By tbe Court: It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 Okla. 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-jacobs-okla-1924.