Walker v. Holmes & Launitz
22 Wend. 614
Opinion
By the Court,
The practice on requiring
security for costs has been regulated by statute, and it is enough that the plaintiff has complied with the statute by executing a bond with a sufficient surety, and the surety has justified. See Barnett v. Pardow, 10 Wendell, 615.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walker v. Holmes & Launitz, 22 Wend. 614 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1840).
22 Wend. 614 (Walker v. Holmes & Launitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Willmont v. Meserole
16 Abb. Pr. 308 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1875)
Miles v. Clarke
17 Bosw. 632 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1859)