Walker v. Hillyer

46 S.E. 92, 119 Ga. 225, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 92
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 12, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 46 S.E. 92 (Walker v. Hillyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. Hillyer, 46 S.E. 92, 119 Ga. 225, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 92 (Ga. 1903).

Opinion

Kish, P. J.

1. The words “ Approved by,” signed in his official capacity by the magistrate of the court in which the case was originally tried, were endorsed on a certiorari bond, and the magistrate certified that the plaintiff in certiorari had “paid all costs in the case (amounting to $(5.75), the subject-matter of the . . petition [for certiorari] and [had] given bond and security as required by law : ” Held, that there was a sufficient, compliance with the statute requiring, in such cases, the approval and acceptance of the bond, and the giving of the certificate of the payment of all costs that have accrued.

2. The record clearly shows that the verdict in the justice’s court was not demanded under the law and the evidence. Consequently this court will not interfere with the first grant of a new trial by the superior court. Shirley v. Swafford, ante, 43.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. ■ Certiorari. Before Judge Henry. Floyd superior court. April 14-1903. . - ' Henry Walker, for plaintiffs in error. Alexander & Hillyer, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. Morris Plan Bank
22 S.E.2d 147 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1942)
Sanford v. Wade
86 S.E. 945 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 S.E. 92, 119 Ga. 225, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-hillyer-ga-1903.