Walker v. Hassall
This text of 212 A.D.2d 981 (Walker v. Hassall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint seeking to impose a constructive trust upon defendant’s residence. Defendant submitted proof in admissible form that she had not promised plaintiff that she would leave the residence to plaintiff in her will if plaintiff assisted in paying the expenses and repair costs of the residence. In response plaintiff failed to submit proof in evidentiary form sufficient to raise an issue of fact whether such a promise was [982]*982made. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Mintz, J.—Dismiss Complaint.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
212 A.D.2d 981, 624 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-hassall-nyappdiv-1995.