Walker v. Gray Line New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Walker v. Gray Line New York

2017 NY Slip Op 3603, 150 A.D.3d 420, 51 N.Y.S.3d 403

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 4, 2017

Docket3890 158775/13

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 3603 (Walker v. Gray Line New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. Gray Line New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 3603, 150 A.D.3d 420, 51 N.Y.S.3d 403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), entered December 9, 2016, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to establish entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff alleges that he was struck by defendant’s red double decker tour bus that had the words “Gray Line” on the side. Defendant’s submissions did not demonstrate that the bus that struck plaintiff was not a Gray Line bus (see Jiann Hwa Fang v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 148 AD3d 791 [2d Dept 2017]). In fact, defendant’s submissions included plaintiff’s deposition testimony and photographs of its buses that correspond with the description provided by plaintiff at his deposition.

Concur—Sweeny, J.R, Gische, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leticia M. Ramirez, J.), entered December 9, 2016, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant failed to establish entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff alleges that he was struck by defendant’s red double decker tour bus that had the words “Gray Line” on the side. Defendant’s submissions did not demonstrate that the bus that struck plaintiff was not a Gray Line bus (see Jiann Hwa Fang v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 148 AD3d 791 [2d Dept 2017]). In fact, defendant’s submissions included plaintiff’s deposition testimony and photographs of its buses that correspond with the description provided by plaintiff at his deposition.

Concur—Sweeny, J.R, Gische, Kahn and Gesmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 NY Slip Op 3603, 150 A.D.3d 420, 51 N.Y.S.3d 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-gray-line-new-york-nyappdiv-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack