Walker v. Goord

Second Circuit

Walker v. Goord

131 F. App'x 775

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 23, 2005·No. No. 02-0023·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant, Sherman Walker, pro se, appeals from the judgment the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York (Chin, J.), granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment, dismissing the complaint, and dismissing various motions filed by Walker.

The parties’ familiarity with the facts is assumed. We affirm the judgment of the district court, for substantially the reasons given by the district court. See Walker v. Keyser, No. 98 Civ. 5217, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15429, 2001 WL 1160588 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2001), amended by, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18518 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2001).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Appellant, Sherman Walker, pro se, appeals from the judgment the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York (Chin, J.), granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment, dismissing the complaint, and dismissing various motions filed by Walker.

The parties’ familiarity with the facts is assumed. We affirm the judgment of the district court, for substantially the reasons given by the district court. See Walker v. Keyser, No. 98 Civ. 5217, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15429, 2001 WL 1160588 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 2, 2001), amended by, 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18518 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2001).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Walker v. Goord, 131 F. App'x 775 (2d Cir. 2005).

Pincite

131 F. App'x 775 (Walker v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related