Walker v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.

50 S.E. 121, 122 Ga. 368, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 208
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 7, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 50 S.E. 121 (Walker v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co., 50 S.E. 121, 122 Ga. 368, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 208 (Ga. 1905).

Opinion

Lamar, J.

The announcement of a station is not an invitation to step from a rapidly moving car. By the exercise of ordinary care the plaintiff could have avoided the consequences of what he claims to have been negligence on the part of the defendant. With full knowledge that the car was running at practically the same speed at which it hadi approached the station, and had barely begun to slow up, the plaintiff stepped therefrom without being forced to do so by the act of the conductor, or other emergency. Even if he proved his case as laid, he disproved it on cross-examination, and there was no error in granting a nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Crisler v. Bank of Canton
199 S.E. 252 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Robertson v. Carroll Furniture Co.
189 S.E. 273 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Findley v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
66 S.E. 485 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Southern Railway Co. v. Strickland
61 S.E. 826 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 S.E. 121, 122 Ga. 368, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-georgia-railway-electric-co-ga-1905.