Walker v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.

50 S.E. 121, 122 Ga. 368, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 208
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 7, 1905·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Lamar, J.

The announcement of a station is not an invitation to step from a rapidly moving car. By the exercise of ordinary care the plaintiff could have avoided the consequences of what he claims to have been negligence on the part of the defendant. With full knowledge that the car was running at practically the same speed at which it hadi approached the station, and had barely begun to slow up, the plaintiff stepped therefrom without being forced to do so by the act of the conductor, or other emergency. Even if he proved his case as laid, he disproved it on cross-examination, and there was no error in granting a nonsuit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co., 50 S.E. 121, 122 Ga. 368, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 208 (Ga. 1905).

50 S.E. 121 (Walker v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crisler v. Bank of Canton
199 S.E. 252 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)
Robertson v. Carroll Furniture Co.
189 S.E. 273 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Findley v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
66 S.E. 485 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Southern Railway Co. v. Strickland
61 S.E. 826 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)