Walker v. Fulford

1 R.I. Dec. 82
CourtSuperior Court of Rhode Island
DecidedJanuary 20, 1925
DocketNo.47975
StatusPublished

This text of 1 R.I. Dec. 82 (Walker v. Fulford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. Fulford, 1 R.I. Dec. 82 (R.I. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

BLODGETT, J.

Heard upon motion for new trial filed by defendant after verdict for plaintiff.

Action to recover for services as an architect.

Plaintiff produced testimony as to a contract for a certain commission if the proposed building were erected, and three-fifths of six per cent, if plans were completed and building not erected.

The defence was that the commission was not to be paid unless the building was actually erected.

The case was submitted to the jury upon the issue as to what the contract was and there was evidence submitted upon which the jury could base a verdict for plaintiff.

The court can not say such verdict is against the preponderance of the evidence or that the amount of the verdict is excessive.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 R.I. Dec. 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-fulford-risuperct-1925.