Walker v. Fouche

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker v. Fouche. Read the opinion of the Court — 390 F. App'x 210
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 2010·No. 10-1454·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1454

MICHELLE WALKER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

REBECCA T. FOUCHE,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:10-cv-00179-JFA)

Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michelle Walker, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Michelle Walker appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing her civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

(2006) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Walker v. Fouche, No. 3:10-cv-00179-JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 12, 2010).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. Fouche, (4th Cir. 2010).

Walker v. Fouche (Walker v. Fouche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proceedings in forma pauperis
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)