Walker v. Fouche
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-1454
MICHELLE WALKER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
REBECCA T. FOUCHE,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (3:10-cv-00179-JFA)
Submitted: July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michelle Walker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michelle Walker appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing her civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2006) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Walker v. Fouche, No. 3:10-cv-00179-JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 12, 2010).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Walker v. Fouche (Walker v. Fouche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.