Walker v. Federal Reserve Bank

Fourth Circuit

Walker v. Federal Reserve Bank

479 F. App'x 464

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 1, 2012·No. No. 12-1675·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Edward Walker appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims against the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Limiting our review to the issues raised in Walker’s informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we deny Walker’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order. See Walker v. Federal Reserve Bank, No. 3:12-cv-00121-JAG (E.D.Va. May 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Edward Walker appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims against the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Limiting our review to the issues raised in Walker’s informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we deny Walker’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order. See Walker v. Federal Reserve Bank, No. 3:12-cv-00121-JAG (E.D.Va. May 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Walker v. Federal Reserve Bank, 479 F. App'x 464 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

479 F. App'x 464 (Walker v. Federal Reserve Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.