Walker v. Federal Reserve Bank
This text of 479 F. App'x 464 (Walker v. Federal Reserve Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Charles Edward Walker appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims against the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Limiting our review to the issues raised in Walker’s informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we deny Walker’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order. See Walker v. Federal Reserve Bank, No. 3:12-cv-00121-JAG (E.D.Va. May 10, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
479 F. App'x 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-federal-reserve-bank-ca4-2012.