Walker v. . Dickerson

3 N.C. 23
CourtSuperior Court of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 5, 1797
StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.C. 23 (Walker v. . Dickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. . Dickerson, 3 N.C. 23 (N.C. Ct. App. 1797).

Opinion

Haywood., Judge.

A similar objection prevailed in a caso reported by Dallas, 120; and the same doctrine seems to he hinted at in 1 Term, 313. 1 am, however, of opinion, when, two persons enter into partnership, it is understood by them and also by others to whom their partnership is known, that they are reciprocally empowered tbs one by the other to sign the name of that other to all obligatory instruments, occasioned by the’r joint concern, as much so as if he had been expressly appointed aa attorney by the other to execute that bond in his name, ,:.sd then the bond is well executed to bind both.

There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Vide, Watson, HO.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 N.C. 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-dickerson-ncsuperct-1797.