Walker v. Coughlin

152 A.D.2d 1011, 544 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9982

This text of 152 A.D.2d 1011 (Walker v. Coughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. Coughlin, 152 A.D.2d 1011, 544 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9982 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner’s sole claim in this proceeding is that the Hearing Officer’s determination was not supported by substantial evidence. Whether petitioner, an inmate at Attica Correctional Facility, refused to submit to a urinalysis test was a matter of credibility for the Hearing Officer (Matter of Perez v Wilmot, 67 NY2d 615; Matter of Summer v Kelly, 139 AD2d 972, Iv denied 72 NY2d 804), and there was substantial evidence to support the Officer’s determination. (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Green, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perez v. Wilmot
490 N.E.2d 526 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Summer v. Kelly
139 A.D.2d 972 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 A.D.2d 1011, 544 N.Y.S.2d 734, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-coughlin-nyappdiv-1989.