Walker v. Coleman
This text of Walker v. Coleman (Walker v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7026
ANTHONY JEROME WALKER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JANET COLEMAN,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:09-ct-03054-BO)
Submitted: July 21, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Jerome Walker, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Anthony Jerome Walker appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Walker v. Coleman, No.
5:09-ct-03054-BO (E.D.N.C. May 19, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Walker v. Coleman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-coleman-ca4-2009.