Walker v. Coleman

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 24, 2009
Docket09-7026
StatusUnpublished

This text of Walker v. Coleman (Walker v. Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. Coleman, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7026

ANTHONY JEROME WALKER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JANET COLEMAN,

Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:09-ct-03054-BO)

Submitted: July 21, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Jerome Walker, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony Jerome Walker appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Walker v. Coleman, No.

5:09-ct-03054-BO (E.D.N.C. May 19, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Walker v. Coleman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-coleman-ca4-2009.