Walker v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2010·No. 09-2358·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2358

DEQUILLA WALKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG SCHOOLS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:09-cv-00035-RJC-DCK)

Submitted: February 10, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2010

Before GREGORY and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dequilla Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Mary H. Crosby, Keith Michael Weddington, PARKER, POE, ADAMS & BERNSTEIN, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dequilla Walker appeals a district court order and

judgment dismissing her complaint against the Charlotte-

Mecklenburg Schools. We have reviewed the record and the

opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court.

See Walker v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, No. 3:09-cv-00035-

RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Nov. 9, 2009). We also find the magistrate

judge did not abuse his discretion in denying Walker’s motion to

amend the complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, (4th Cir. 2010).

Walker v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (Walker v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.