Home/Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama/Walker v. Capstone Building Corp.

Walker v. Capstone Building Corp.

96 So. 3d 102, 2012 WL 1561084, 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 107
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedMay 4, 2012
Docket2081153
StatusPublished

This text of 96 So. 3d 102 (Walker v. Capstone Building Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. Capstone Building Corp., 96 So. 3d 102, 2012 WL 1561084, 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 107 (Ala. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

THOMPSON, Presiding Judge.

On March 26, 2010, this court reversed the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Capstone Building Corporation insofar as it concluded that William Walker’s wantonness claim is barred by a two-year statute of limitations. The Alabama Supreme Court has reversed the judgment of this court. Ex parte Capstone Building Corp., 96 So.3d 77 (Ala.2012). On remand, and in compliance with the Supreme Court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

PITTMAN, BRYAN, THOMAS, and MOORE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Capstone Building Corp.
96 So. 3d 77 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
96 So. 3d 102, 2012 WL 1561084, 2012 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-capstone-building-corp-alacivapp-2012.