Walker v. BUHARP

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Walker v. BUHARP

28 So. 3d 186, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1638, 2010 WL 547163

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 18, 2010

Docket1D09-5312

StatusPublished

This text of 28 So. 3d 186 (Walker v. BUHARP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. BUHARP, 28 So. 3d 186, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1638, 2010 WL 547163 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of December 18, 2009, the Court has determined that the appeal is premature and that dismissal is appropriate. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. The appellant’s Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction, filed on December 28, 2009, and the Motion for Enlargement of Time to Serve Initial Brief are denied.

WEBSTER, PADOVANO, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of December 18, 2009, the Court has determined that the appeal is premature and that dismissal is appropriate. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. The appellant’s Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction, filed on December 28, 2009, and the Motion for Enlargement of Time to Serve Initial Brief are denied.

WEBSTER, PADOVANO, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 So. 3d 186, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1638, 2010 WL 547163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-buharp-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack