Walker v. BUHARP

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Walker v. BUHARP

28 So. 3d 186, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1638, 2010 WL 547163

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 2010·No. 1D09-5312·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of December 18, 2009, the Court has determined that the appeal is premature and that dismissal is appropriate. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. The appellant’s Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction, filed on December 28, 2009, and the Motion for Enlargement of Time to Serve Initial Brief are denied.

WEBSTER, PADOVANO, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of December 18, 2009, the Court has determined that the appeal is premature and that dismissal is appropriate. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. The appellant’s Motion to Relinquish Jurisdiction, filed on December 28, 2009, and the Motion for Enlargement of Time to Serve Initial Brief are denied.

WEBSTER, PADOVANO, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Walker v. BUHARP, 28 So. 3d 186, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 1638, 2010 WL 547163 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

28 So. 3d 186 (Walker v. BUHARP) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related