Walker v. Briggs

Second Circuit

Walker v. Briggs

143 F. App'x 399

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedSeptember 23, 2005

DocketDocket No. 04-2357

StatusPublished

This text of 143 F. App'x 399 (Walker v. Briggs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. Briggs, 143 F. App'x 399 (2d Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, at Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 23rd day of September, two thousand and five.

UPON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff pro se Tommy Walker appeals from a judgment, entered March 25, 2004, dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action after a bench trial held before Magistrate Judge Gustave J. DiBianco. The District Court denied plaintiffs claims that (1) the search of his girlfriend’s apartment on November 18, 1988 was conducted in violation of plaintiffs Fourth Amendment rights; and (2) the statements plaintiff made later that day while in police custody were coerced in violation of his Fifth Amendment rights.

We have reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, and considered all of plaintiffs arguments on appeal and find each of them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, at Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 23rd day of September, two thousand and five.

UPON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the order of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff pro se Tommy Walker appeals from a judgment, entered March 25, 2004, dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action after a bench trial held before Magistrate Judge Gustave J. DiBianco. The District Court denied plaintiffs claims that (1) the search of his girlfriend’s apartment on November 18, 1988 was conducted in violation of plaintiffs Fourth Amendment rights; and (2) the statements plaintiff made later that day while in police custody were coerced in violation of his Fifth Amendment rights.

We have reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, and considered all of plaintiffs arguments on appeal and find each of them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 F. App'x 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-briggs-ca2-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack