Walker v. Biles-Coleman Lumber Co.

466 P.2d 513, 77 Wash. 2d 658, 1970 Wash. LEXIS 358
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 26, 1970
DocketNo. 40002
StatusPublished

This text of 466 P.2d 513 (Walker v. Biles-Coleman Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. Biles-Coleman Lumber Co., 466 P.2d 513, 77 Wash. 2d 658, 1970 Wash. LEXIS 358 (Wash. 1970).

Opinion

Neill, J.

The Supervisor of Water Resources appeals from a decree adjudicating the rights to the use of water of Chiliwist Creek. The supervisor is statutory referee. RCW 90.03.160. Chiliwist Creek is a small, nonnavigable tributary to the Okanogan River and lies entirely within Okanogan County.

Among the 14 claims filed in the proceedings, is the claim of the Department of Natural Resources of the state which claims riparian and appropriative rights for stock water for school lands lying within the drainage of one or more branches of the creek. The state’s lands are best used for forestry and cattle grazing.

[659]*659The trial court’s decree granted the Department of Natural Resources’ exception to the supervisor-referee’s report and granted the state’s claim.1 The state acquired certain of the school lands upon entry into the Union, while other lands were acquired as “lieu” or “indemnity” lands in 1925. The supervisor’s assignment of error does not clearly and properly raise an issue as to t'he priority dates in the decree. Nor does the opening brief of the supervisor discuss this issue. Therefore we do not consider the matter. Fosbre v. State, 70 Wn.2d 578, 424 P.2d 901 (1967); ROA 1-41(1).

The supervisor’s appeal is based on his contention that the decree is in violation of In re Crab Creek & Moses Lake, 134 Wash. 7, 235 P. 37 (1925), wherein this court held that riparian rights do not attach to state trust land until the land has been transferred into private ownership. Thus the issue presented is identical to the issue in In re Stranger Creek, 77 Wn.2d 649, 466 P.2d 508 (1970), decided this date.

On the basis of In re Stranger Creek, supra, the decree of the trial court is affirmed.

Hunter, C. J., Finley, Weaver, Rosellini, Hamilton, Hale, and McGovern, JJ., concur.

May 8,1970. Petition for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Stranger Creek
466 P.2d 508 (Washington Supreme Court, 1970)
Fosbre v. State
424 P.2d 901 (Washington Supreme Court, 1967)
In Re Crab Creek and Moses Lake
235 P. 37 (Washington Supreme Court, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 P.2d 513, 77 Wash. 2d 658, 1970 Wash. LEXIS 358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-biles-coleman-lumber-co-wash-1970.