Walker v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided February 22, 2023·No. 4:20-cv-00449·Unknown

Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5

9 Gerald Walker, III, et al., No. CV-20-00449-TUC-CKJ

10 Plaintiffs, ORDER

11 v.

12 Auto-Owners Insurance Company,

13 Defendant. 14 15 The Court, having reviewed the parties' Joint Case Management Report and having 16 conducted a Scheduling Conference: 17 IT IS ORDERED that this case, alleging class action claims challenging 18 Defendant’s standard practice of depreciating both labor and materials for property loss 19 claims allegedly in violation of Arizona law, a complex case and assigns it to the complex 20 track for case management. LRCiv. 16.2(b)(4). 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall abide by the following schedule 22 and rules: 23 A. Initial disclosures, under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Federal Rules") 24 26(a)(1) have been exchanged. The Court notifies the parties that to satisfy the requirement 25 of Rule 26, the parties shall file a Notice of Service of discovery papers with the Clerk of 26 the Court, rather than copies of actual disclosures. See Rules of Practice of the United 27 States District Court for the District of Arizona, Civil ("Local Rules") 5.2. 28 1 B. Mediation: The parties will exchange data and engage in mediation with a 2 mediator jointly selected to attempt settlement of this action by April 14, 2023. 3 C. Amended Pleadings shall be governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15. 4 D. Expert testimony (class certification): Notice of Plaintiff’s initial expert 5 testimony pursuant to Federal Rule 26(a)(2) shall take place on or before July 14, 2023; 6 Defendant’s initial expert testimony pursuant to Federal Rule 26(a)(2) shall take place on 7 or before September 1, 2023, with any rebuttal expert testimony shall be completed on or 8 before September 15, 2023; Expert testimony (class claims and damages): Notice of 9 Plaintiff’s initial expert testimony pursuant to Federal Rule 26(a)(2) shall be made 120 10 days after class certification; Defendant’s rebuttal reports due within 45 days. 11 E. Discovery (class certification and Plaintiff’s claim), including depositions 12 of parties and witnesses, shall be completed by May 12, 2023; Discovery (class claims 13 and damages), including depositions of parties and witnesses, shall be completed by 180 14 days after class certification. 1 15 1. Generally, the limits on discovery by as set forth in Federal Rules 30, 16 31, and 33 shall apply: twenty-five (25) single-part question interrogatories, depositions 17 of parties and respective experts, and not more than ten non-party fact witness depositions 18 per party. 19 2. Notwithstanding any provisions of the Federal Rules or any other 20 provisions of this Order, non-party witnesses shall not be allowed to attend, physically, 21 electronically or otherwise, the deposition of any other witness in this case without an 22 Order of the Court to the contrary. 23 3. The parties and counsel are reminded of their duty under Federal Rule 24 26(e) to supplement all Rule 26(a) disclosures and responses to discovery requests. 25 Pursuant to Rule 26(e)(1), any additions or other changes to information previously 26 disclosed must be made prior to the time that Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures are due.

27 1 In the event the class is not certified and Plaintiff proceeds to trial, individually, the parties agree that a more expedited schedule would be appropriate than that proposed here for the 28 class action. The Plaintiff should propose such a schedule within 14 days of the Court’s disposition of the September 28, 2023, motions. 1 This Order contemplates that all exhibits and witnesses that may be offered at trial will 2 have been disclosed before the close of discovery. This Order, therefore, supersedes the 3 "30 days before trial" disclosure deadline contained in Rule 26(a)(3). Therefore, (1) failure 4 to timely supplement Rule 26(a) disclosure, including but not limited to witnesses and 5 exhibits, or (2) failure to timely supplement responses to any valid discovery requests, or 6 (3) attempting to include any witnesses or exhibits in the Proposed Final Pretrial Order that 7 were not previously disclosed in a timely manner as to allow for meaningful discovery 8 prior to the discovery cutoff date, may result in the exclusion of such evidence at trial or 9 the imposition of sanctions. 10 4. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(j), parties must personally consult and 11 make a sincere effort to resolve a discovery dispute before seeking the Court's assistance. 12 If the parties are unable to resolve a discovery dispute, the parties shall notify the Court by 13 telephone at (520) 205-4550, and the Court will schedule a telephonic conference. Written 14 briefs shall be filed only at the direction of the Court. 15 F. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502: 16 1. The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, 17 electronically stored information (ESI) or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, 18 is not a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other 19 federal or state proceeding. This order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum 20 protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). 21 2. Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party's 22 right to conduct a review of documents, ESI, or information (including metadata) for 23 relevance, responsiveness and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information 24 before production. 25 G. Class Certification motion: due September 29, 2023. 26 H. Dispositive motions (Plaintiff’s individual claim and affirmative 27 defenses) shall be filed on or before September 29, 2023; Dispositive motions (class 28 claims and damages) due by 200 days after class certification. 1 1. If a party seeks oral argument on a motion, he shall request it at the 2 time the motion or response is filed, pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(f). 3 2. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2, parties may file a motion, response and 4 reply. No additional briefing on a motion is allowed unless leave of Court is granted. 5 Failure to file a response may be deemed a consent to a granting of the motion. A response 6 must be served and filed within fourteen (14) days of service of the motion; the moving 7 party has seven (7) days from service to serve and file a reply. Federal Rule 56 motions 8 for summary judgment and Federal Rule 12(b)(1) motions to dismiss for lack of subject 9 matter jurisdiction provide an exception to the above time limits – time for response is 10 thirty (30) days and for reply fifteen (15) days. See L.R. 56.1(d). Unless otherwise 11 permitted by the Court, a motion or response, inclusive of supporting memorandum but 12 exclusive of attachments and statement of facts, shall not exceed seventeen (17) pages; a 13 reply shall not exceed eleven (11) pages. 14 3. The Court advises the parties that the Local Rule requirement that 15 “[a]ny party opposing a motion for summary judgment shall file a statement, separate from 16 that party’s memorandum of law, setting forth . . . for each paragraph of the moving party’s 17 separate statement of facts, a correspondingly numbered paragraph indicating whether the 18 party disputes the statement of fact set forth in that paragraph and a reference to the specific 19 admissible portion of the record supporting the party’s position if the fact is disputed . . . 20 [,]” L.R.Civ. 56.1, shall only apply to material facts that establish or dispute a genuine issue 21 in dispute. 22 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company, (D. Ariz. 2023).

Walker v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company (Walker v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related