Walker v. Allen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Walker v. Allen

281 So. 2d 693, 1973 La. LEXIS 6798

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJuly 12, 1973

DocketNo. 53750

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 281 So. 2d 693 (Walker v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walker v. Allen, 281 So. 2d 693, 1973 La. LEXIS 6798 (La. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

[694]*694Writ not considered. Applicant must first exhaust his remedies below by invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of the court having appellate jurisdiction in the premises (Twenty-fourth Judicial District Court) before invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. R.S. 13:2562.11. See State v. Greff, 255 La. 211, 230 So.2d 81 (1969); La. St. Bd. of Medical Examiners v. Eastman, 251 La. 1032, 208 So.2d 318 (1968); La. St. Bd. of Medical Examiners v. England, 251 La. 1033, 208 So.2d 318 (1968); Moity v. Mahfouz, 242 La. 625, 137 So.2d 514 (1961).

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

By supplement to the record in this application, it having been shown that the 24th Judicial District Court has denied supervisory jurisdiction in the matter, we grant this application and the Judge of the 24th Judicial District Court shall forthwith consider applicant’s petition for mandamus under its supervisory jurisdiction or show cause to the contrary in this court on or before July 23, 1973, at 10 o’clock a. m. Applicant cannot be sentenced as a second offender for he is not charged as such. La.Code Crim.P. Art. 483; State v. Montgomery, 250 La. 326, 195 So.2d 285 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[694]*694Writ not considered. Applicant must first exhaust his remedies below by invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of the court having appellate jurisdiction in the premises (Twenty-fourth Judicial District Court) before invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. R.S. 13:2562.11. See State v. Greff, 255 La. 211, 230 So.2d 81 (1969); La. St. Bd. of Medical Examiners v. Eastman, 251 La. 1032, 208 So.2d 318 (1968); La. St. Bd. of Medical Examiners v. England, 251 La. 1033, 208 So.2d 318 (1968); Moity v. Mahfouz, 242 La. 625, 137 So.2d 514 (1961).

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION

By supplement to the record in this application, it having been shown that the 24th Judicial District Court has denied supervisory jurisdiction in the matter, we grant this application and the Judge of the 24th Judicial District Court shall forthwith consider applicant’s petition for mandamus under its supervisory jurisdiction or show cause to the contrary in this court on or before July 23, 1973, at 10 o’clock a. m. Applicant cannot be sentenced as a second offender for he is not charged as such. La.Code Crim.P. Art. 483; State v. Montgomery, 250 La. 326, 195 So.2d 285 (1967).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 So. 2d 693, 1973 La. LEXIS 6798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-allen-la-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack