Walker v. 127 West 22nd Street Associates

281 A.D.2d 539, 722 N.Y.S.2d 250, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2644
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 19, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 281 A.D.2d 539 (Walker v. 127 West 22nd Street Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. 127 West 22nd Street Associates, 281 A.D.2d 539, 722 N.Y.S.2d 250, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cammer, J.), dated July 27, 2000, which, upon [540]*540granting the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 made at the close of the evidence to dismiss the complaint, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured when he slipped and fell on a staircase in the defendant’s building, which was leased to the plaintiffs employer. The staircase provided access between the first floor and the basement levels of the building. At trial, the plaintiff introduced expert testimony attempting to prove that the staircase violated Administrative Code of the City of New York § 27-375, which pertains to interior stairs. However, contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the Supreme Court properly determined that those stairs were not interior stairs as that term is defined in Administrative Code of the City of New York § 27-232, and thus the Code regulations governing interior staircases did not apply (see, Union Bank & Trust Co. v Hattie Carnegie, Inc., 1 AD2d 199; see also, Gaston v New York City Hous. Auth., 258 AD2d 220; Nameny v East N. Y. Sav. Bank, 267 AD2d 108). The plaintiff failed to prove that the defendant, an out-of-possession landlord, violated any specific statutory provision (see, Guzman v Haven Plaza Hous. Dev. Fund Co., 69 NY2d 559; Kilimnik v Mirage Rest., 223 AD2d 530). Accordingly, the court properly dismissed the complaint at the close of the evidence. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kavenaght v. 498 Seventh, LLC
2024 NY Slip Op 04765 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Lasch v. Westbeth Corp. Hous. Dev.
2024 NY Slip Op 31207(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Lasch v. Westbeth Corp. Hous. Dev. Fund Co., Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 31207(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Bautista v. 85th Columbus Corp.
42 Misc. 3d 651 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)
Kociecki v. EOP-Midtown Properties, LLC
66 A.D.3d 967 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Cusumano v. City of New York
63 A.D.3d 5 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Schwartz v. Hersh
50 A.D.3d 1011 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Dooley v. Vornado Realty Trust
39 A.D.3d 460 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Maraia v. Church of Our Lady of Mount Carmel
36 A.D.3d 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Mansfield v. Dolcemascolo
34 A.D.3d 763 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Grayson v. Hall
31 A.D.3d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Maksuti v. Best Italian Pizza
27 A.D.3d 300 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Chaehee Jung v. Kum Gang, Inc.
22 A.D.3d 441 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Weiss v. City of New York
16 A.D.3d 680 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Dorman v. 19-20 Indus. City Assocs., Inc.
2004 NY Slip Op 50754(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D.2d 539, 722 N.Y.S.2d 250, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-127-west-22nd-street-associates-nyappdiv-2001.