Walker, Richard Miller
This text of Walker, Richard Miller (Walker, Richard Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to seventy-five years' imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Walker v. State, No. 14-01-01197-CR (Tex. App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref'd).
In a single ground in an amended application, Applicant contends that trial counsel failed to object to the admission of extraneous offense evidence at punishment. He contends that the State failed to provide pretrial notice or else provided inadequate pretrial notice of its intent to introduce extraneous offense evidence. The trial court adopted Applicant's proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that we grant Applicant a new punishment hearing. Based on our own independent review of the record, we find that the State's notice was sufficient and that the trial court would not have erred in overruling counsel's objection. Relief is denied.
Filed: April 17, 2013
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Walker, Richard Miller, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-richard-miller-texcrimapp-2013.