Walker Goggins v. Housing Urban Development

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 * * *

9 ANNETTE WALKER GOGGINS, Case No. 2:21-cv-00655-RFB-NJK

10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v.

12 HOUSING URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No.8] of the 17 Honorable Nancy J. Koppe, United States Magistrate Judge, entered July 14, 2021. 18 A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 19 recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific 20 written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 21 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is 22 required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed 23 findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local 24 Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct 25 “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 26 Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due 27 by July 28, 2021. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case 28 and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 8] 1s ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 3 IT IS FURTHER. ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice. 4 5 The Court Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff. 6 7 DATED: October 26, 2021. AS 8 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II 9 United States District Judge 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

-2-