Walker Discount Corp. v. Sapin

48 Misc. 2d 277, 264 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1554
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided August 26, 1965·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Even if the witness was not acquainted with the speaker and therefore did not recognize his voice at the time of the telephone conversation, the telephone conversation is admissible if the witness testifies that he met the speaker thereafter and then recognized his voice as the voice he had heard [278] over the telephone. The difference affects the weight rather than the competency of the evidence (Richardson, Evidence [9th ed.], § 384, subd. [f], p. 368).

The judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Concur — Tilzeb, J. P., Hecht and Hoestadteb, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker Discount Corp. v. Sapin, 48 Misc. 2d 277, 264 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

48 Misc. 2d 277 (Walker Discount Corp. v. Sapin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clark v. Donovan
34 A.D.2d 1099 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1970)