Walker County v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

109 F. 1064, 47 C.C.A. 687, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4307
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Walker County v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland. Read the opinion of the Court — 107 F. 851
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 28, 1901·No. No. 982·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the opinion filed in this case we held that, on the facts made by the record and evidence, the surety company was not entitled to a credit for the sum of $1,917.48, amount of March collections returned April 4, 1898, and paid November 29, 1898, and alleged to have been paid with moneys collected by Tax Collector Davis after the new bond was given. Whether, on another trial, on proof that, prior to the' acceptance of the second bond, Tax Collector Davis had parted with, appropriated, or embezzled the amount of taxes collected by him in March, 1S98, as shown by return made April 4, 1898, and upon further proof that the taxes collected by Tax Collector Davis after the new bond went in force were applied by the county treasurer to the payment of the return of April 4th, with knowledge as to "the source from which the same were obtained, and without the direction of Davis, the surety company would be entitled to the credit in question, we express no opinion. The petition for rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker County v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland, 109 F. 1064, 47 C.C.A. 687, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 4307 (5th Cir. 1901).

109 F. 1064 (Walker County v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.