Walker Bank & Trust Co. v. State Tax Commission

422 P.2d 201, 18 Utah 2d 300, 1967 Utah LEXIS 656
Utah Supreme Court·Decided January 5, 1967·No. No. 10629·Published

Opinion

HENRIOD, Chief Justice:

Appeal from a Tax Commission decision that “step-children” were not “children” under Title 59-12-2, Utah Code Annotated, 1953, giving a $40,000 exemption where the surviving spouse “and/or children of the deceased” are involved. Affirmed, with no costs awarded.

The legislation is clear. It says “children,” not “step-children.” In re Walton’s Estate1 said “grandchildren” were not “children” under such a statute. We think that case is somewhat significant here, and affirm it. The complications of twisting the language to include any one but a natural or legally adopted child seem obvious. Otherwise, the words “cousin” or “mistress” might acquire added significance if either claimed his or her benefactor was a loco “parentis.”

This is a matter for the legislator and his lexicographer, — not us.

CROCKETT and TUCKETT, JJ., and PARLEY E. NORSETH, District Judge, concur. CALLISTER, J., does not participate herein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walker Bank & Trust Co. v. State Tax Commission, 422 P.2d 201, 18 Utah 2d 300, 1967 Utah LEXIS 656 (Utah 1967).

422 P.2d 201 (Walker Bank & Trust Co. v. State Tax Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.