Walker, Anthony Glenn

• Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
• Decided: May 11, 2011
• Docket: WR-75,625-03
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-75,625-01, WR-75,625-02 & WR-75,625-03

EX PARTE ANTHONY GLENN WALKER, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W08-52341-U(A), W08-52342-U(A) AND W-08-52343-U(A)

IN THE 291^st JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two charges of aggravated robbery and one charge of possession of a controlled substance. He was sentenced to thirty-five years' imprisonment for each of the aggravated robbery convictions and two years' imprisonment for the possession of a controlled substance.

On March 17, 2011, the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law that were based on the applications, the State's response, the official court records, and affidavits provided by Applicant's trial and appellate counsel. The trial court recommended that relief be denied.

The trial court's findings did not fully address all fact issues necessary to the resolution of the claims that were raised by Applicant. Nonetheless, this Court has undertaken an independent review of all the evidence in the record. Applicant's third ground, in which he alleges trial court error is not cognizable because it could have been, but was not raised on direct appeal. See Ex parte Banks, 769 S.W.2d 539 (Tex. Crim. App. 1989). Based on the trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law as well as this Court's independent review of the entire record, we deny relief.

Filed: May 11, 2011

Do not publish