Waligovska v. Waligovska

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Waligovska v. Waligovska

133 A.D.2d 755, 519 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51795

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 19, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 133 A.D.2d 755 (Waligovska v. Waligovska) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waligovska v. Waligovska, 133 A.D.2d 755, 519 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51795 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant husband from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated October 3, 1986, which granted the wife’s motion to modify a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, dated September 15, 1978, to compel the sale of the parties’ former marital residence.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the motion is denied, without prejudice to renewal in the Supreme Court, New York County.

In view of the fact that the judgment of divorce was obtained in the Supreme Court, New York County, this application to modify that judgment should have been addressed to the court which made the original judgment and not to the Supreme Court in another county (see, Koffler v Koffler, 87 AD2d 837; Koval v Novick, 70 AD2d 586; Fallis v Fallis, 54 AD2d 683). Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant husband from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roncallo, J.), dated October 3, 1986, which granted the wife’s motion to modify a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County, dated September 15, 1978, to compel the sale of the parties’ former marital residence.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the motion is denied, without prejudice to renewal in the Supreme Court, New York County.

In view of the fact that the judgment of divorce was obtained in the Supreme Court, New York County, this application to modify that judgment should have been addressed to the court which made the original judgment and not to the Supreme Court in another county (see, Koffler v Koffler, 87 AD2d 837; Koval v Novick, 70 AD2d 586; Fallis v Fallis, 54 AD2d 683). Kunzeman, J. P., Kooper, Spatt and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 A.D.2d 755, 519 N.Y.S.2d 1000, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waligovska-v-waligovska-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack