Walgreens Co. v. Isela Quintero
This text of Walgreens Co. v. Isela Quintero (Walgreens Co. v. Isela Quintero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS § WALGREENS CO., § No. 08-09-00224-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § 210th District Court ISELA QUINTERO, § of El Paso County, Texas Appellee. § (TC# 2007-5215)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before the Court is the joint motion of Appellant, Walgreens Co., and Appellee, Isela
Quintero, to vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss the underlying case pursuant to TEX . R.
APP . P. 42.1 and 43.2 because the parties have settled all matters in controversy. We grant the
motion, vacate the trial court’s judgment, and dismiss the case with prejudice. TEX . R. APP . P. 43.2.
Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, we assess costs and attorneys’ fees against the party incurring
same. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.1(d) (absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against
the appellant).
GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice July 29, 2011
Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Walgreens Co. v. Isela Quintero, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walgreens-co-v-isela-quintero-texapp-2011.