Walgreen Co. v. Schauerman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Walgreen Co. v. Schauerman

202 So. 2d 105

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 12, 1967

DocketNo. 774

StatusPublished

This text of 202 So. 2d 105 (Walgreen Co. v. Schauerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Walgreen Co. v. Schauerman, 202 So. 2d 105 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Walgreen Co., appeals judgment for the plaintiffs, Frank Schauer-man and Ruth Schauerman, entered upon verdict of the jury in a trip and fall accident.

A careful consideration of the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argument of counsel for the parties establishes a factual situation that was properly submitted to the ■ jury. Under such circumstances this court must sustain the verdict and judgment.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS and CROSS, JJ., and WEISSING, LOUIS, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Walgreen Co., appeals judgment for the plaintiffs, Frank Schauer-man and Ruth Schauerman, entered upon verdict of the jury in a trip and fall accident.

A careful consideration of the record on appeal, the briefs and oral argument of counsel for the parties establishes a factual situation that was properly submitted to the ■ jury. Under such circumstances this court must sustain the verdict and judgment.

Affirmed.

ANDREWS and CROSS, JJ., and WEISSING, LOUIS, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

202 So. 2d 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walgreen-co-v-schauerman-fladistctapp-1967.