Walgreen Co. v. Catlin

650 So. 2d 94, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 438, 1995 WL 25767
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 25, 1995·No. No. 94-2353·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the county court, a landlord instituted an eviction proceeding based upon a claim of breach of a covenant to maintain the premises. At the conclusion of the bench trial, the trial court entered an involuntary dismissal in favor of the tenant. The landlord appealed. The appellate court disposed of the appeal by reversing for a new trial. It then granted unconditionally a motion for attorney’s fees which the landlord had filed, citing section 83.231, Florida Statutes (1993). It may have been the intention of the appellate court to have granted the motion and remand to the county court for determination in the event the landlord ultimately prevailed on the merits. However, we have no way of knowing what the appellate court meant nor will we reconstruct the events and make such a determination nor will we substitute our judgment for that of the appellate court. Accordingly, we accept jurisdiction, allow the writ, and quash the attorney’s fees order for the reasons stated herein and on authority of Dooley v. Culver, 392 So.2d 575 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Walgreen Co. v. Catlin, 650 So. 2d 94, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 438, 1995 WL 25767 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

650 So. 2d 94 (Walgreen Co. v. Catlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dooley v. Culver
392 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)