Wales v. Ford

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Wales v. Ford

8 N.J.L. 329

DecidedFebruary 15, 1826

StatusPublished

This text of 8 N.J.L. 329 (Wales v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wales v. Ford, 8 N.J.L. 329 (N.J. 1826).

Pincite

Opinion

Ey the Court.

The action was misconceived. If any action can be sustained it must be in the form of trespass on the case. . It was improper for the Common Pleas to •adjudge- against Wales the costs of the appeal which, in their opinion, was lawfully made from the erroneous judgment of the justice. Whether this error should affect the whole judgment needs not be examined as for the reason •already mentioned the judgment is to be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ey the Court.

The action was misconceived. If any action can be sustained it must be in the form of trespass on the case. . It was improper for the Common Pleas to •adjudge- against Wales the costs of the appeal which, in their opinion, was lawfully made from the erroneous judgment of the justice. Whether this error should affect the whole judgment needs not be examined as for the reason •already mentioned the judgment is to be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 N.J.L. 329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wales-v-ford-nj-1826.