Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Waldstreicher v. Solomon

Waldstreicher v. Solomon

127 A.D. 364, 111 N.Y.S. 500, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1986
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 29, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 127 A.D. 364 (Waldstreicher v. Solomon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waldstreicher v. Solomon, 127 A.D. 364, 111 N.Y.S. 500, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinions

Gaynor, J.:

.. Section. 3228 of the Code of Civil Procedure (sub. 5) does" riot mean that- a plaintiff'in Kings county is called upon to bring his action in the City Court of Mew York,,which is in Mew.York county, when hé ¡can, as a test of whether he may recover costs if he recover less .than $500. Each county stands separate in the application of the statute. .

The order should be affirmed.

Jenks, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred; Hooker, J., read for reversal. , . , - ""

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hayward v. Clifton
221 A.D. 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
Hamlin v. Bender
173 A.D. 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
Burgdorf v. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban Railroad
130 A.D. 253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 A.D. 364, 111 N.Y.S. 500, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waldstreicher-v-solomon-nyappdiv-1908.