Waldstreicher v. Solomon
127 A.D. 364, 111 N.Y.S. 500, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1986
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 29, 1908·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinions
.. Section. 3228 of the Code of Civil Procedure (sub. 5) does" riot mean that- a plaintiff'in Kings county is called upon to bring his action in the City Court of Mew York,,which is in Mew.York county, when hé ¡can, as a test of whether he may recover costs if he recover less .than $500. Each county stands separate in the application of the statute. .
The order should be affirmed.
Jenks, Rich and Miller, JJ., concurred; Hooker, J., read for reversal. , . , - ""
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Waldstreicher v. Solomon, 127 A.D. 364, 111 N.Y.S. 500, 1908 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).
127 A.D. 364 (Waldstreicher v. Solomon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hayward v. Clifton
221 A.D. 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1927)
Hamlin v. Bender
173 A.D. 996 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
Burgdorf v. Brooklyn, Queens County & Suburban Railroad
130 A.D. 253 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)