Waldrop v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Waldrop v. State

128 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 685

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 1930·No. 6 Div. 754.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The prosecution against this appellant for violating the prohibition law originated in the county court. From a judgment of conviction in that court he appealed to the circuit court, and was there tried by a jury, was again convicted, and appealed here.

A question of fact is presented by the evidence. No error in any of the court’s rulings appear. The evidence was ample to support the. jury’s verdict. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal -was taken is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The prosecution against this appellant for violating the prohibition law originated in the county court. From a judgment of conviction in that court he appealed to the circuit court, and was there tried by a jury, was again convicted, and appealed here.

A question of fact is presented by the evidence. No error in any of the court’s rulings appear. The evidence was ample to support the. jury’s verdict. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal -was taken is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Waldrop v. State, 128 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 685 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

128 So. 926 (Waldrop v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.