Waldrop v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Waldrop v. State

128 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 685

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 20, 1930

Docket6 Div. 754.

StatusPublished

This text of 128 So. 926 (Waldrop v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waldrop v. State, 128 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 685 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The prosecution against this appellant for violating the prohibition law originated in the county court. From a judgment of conviction in that court he appealed to the circuit court, and was there tried by a jury, was again convicted, and appealed here.

A question of fact is presented by the evidence. No error in any of the court’s rulings appear. The evidence was ample to support the. jury’s verdict. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal -was taken is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The prosecution against this appellant for violating the prohibition law originated in the county court. From a judgment of conviction in that court he appealed to the circuit court, and was there tried by a jury, was again convicted, and appealed here.

A question of fact is presented by the evidence. No error in any of the court’s rulings appear. The evidence was ample to support the. jury’s verdict. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal -was taken is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 So. 926, 23 Ala. App. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waldrop-v-state-alactapp-1930.