Waldrop v. Science Applications International Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Waldrop v. Science Applications International Corp.

473 F. App'x 220

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 8, 2012·No. No. 11-1989·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Fariba Waldrop appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging national origin discrimination and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Waldrop v. Science Applications Int’l Corp., No. 8:10-cv-00328-AW, 2011 WL 4025410 (D.Md. Sept. 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Fariba Waldrop appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action alleging national origin discrimination and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Waldrop v. Science Applications Int’l Corp., No. 8:10-cv-00328-AW, 2011 WL 4025410 (D.Md. Sept. 9, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Waldrop v. Science Applications International Corp., 473 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

473 F. App'x 220 (Waldrop v. Science Applications International Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.