Waldrop v. Lampert
This text of 14 P.3d 647 (Waldrop v. Lampert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. We reject without discussion his claim that the court erred in concluding that he had not received ineffective assistance of trial counsel in the underlying criminal case.
Petitioner also contends that the trial court failed to make appropriate findings to support its decision to require him to repay the cost of his court-appointed counsel in the post-conviction proceeding. We reject that argument on the ground that it was not preserved. Bacote v. Johnson, 169 Or App 46, 7 P3d 729 (2000).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 P.3d 647, 171 Or. App. 71, 2000 Ore. App. LEXIS 1890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waldrop-v-lampert-orctapp-2000.