Waldron v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Waldron v. New York City Transit Authority

69 A.D.2d 907, 416 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11665

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 30, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 69 A.D.2d 907 (Waldron v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waldron v. New York City Transit Authority, 69 A.D.2d 907, 416 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11665 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, dated April 26, 1977, which discharged the petitioner from his position. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances, we do not find the petitioner’s dismissal to be so disproportionate to the offense or the risk of harm to the respondent or the public "' "as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness”.’ ” (See Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233, 234; see, also, Matter of Kutchera v New York City Tr. Auth., 37 NY2d 732.) Titone, J. P., Suozzi, Lazer and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent, dated April 26, 1977, which discharged the petitioner from his position. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. Under the circumstances, we do not find the petitioner’s dismissal to be so disproportionate to the offense or the risk of harm to the respondent or the public "' "as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness”.’ ” (See Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 233, 234; see, also, Matter of Kutchera v New York City Tr. Auth., 37 NY2d 732.) Titone, J. P., Suozzi, Lazer and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 A.D.2d 907, 416 N.Y.S.2d 520, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waldron-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack