Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Waldrip v. State

Waldrip v. State

135 S.E. 516, 36 Ga. App. 120, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 812
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 9, 1926
Docket17593
StatusPublished

This text of 135 S.E. 516 (Waldrip v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waldrip v. State, 135 S.E. 516, 36 Ga. App. 120, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 812 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only; there was some evidence authorizing the verdict, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke, J., concurs. Bloodworth, J., absent on account of illness.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 S.E. 516, 36 Ga. App. 120, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 812, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waldrip-v-state-gactapp-1926.