Waldock v. Adkins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Waldock v. Adkins

1916 OK 415, 156 P. 1192, 57 Okla. 103, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 484

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 5, 1916

Docket6434

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK 415 (Waldock v. Adkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waldock v. Adkins, 1916 OK 415, 156 P. 1192, 57 Okla. 103, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 484 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

BURFORD, ,C.

The plaintiff in error has filed his record and brief herein. The defendant in error has failed to brief the cause. Under the repeated decisions of this court we are not required to search the record to sustain the judgment. The brief for plaintiff in error fairly sustains the assignments of error alleged therein.

The cause is therefore reversed, with directions to the trial court to grant a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

BURFORD, ,C.

The plaintiff in error has filed his record and brief herein. The defendant in error has failed to brief the cause. Under the repeated decisions of this court we are not required to search the record to sustain the judgment. The brief for plaintiff in error fairly sustains the assignments of error alleged therein.

The cause is therefore reversed, with directions to the trial court to grant a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1916 OK 415, 156 P. 1192, 57 Okla. 103, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waldock-v-adkins-okla-1916.