Waldock v. Adkins

1916 OK 415, 156 P. 1192, 57 Okla. 103, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 484
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided April 5, 1916·No. 6434·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

BURFORD, ,C.

The plaintiff in error has filed his record and brief herein. The defendant in error has failed to brief the cause. Under the repeated decisions of this court we are not required to search the record to sustain the judgment. The brief for plaintiff in error fairly sustains the assignments of error alleged therein.

The cause is therefore reversed, with directions to the trial court to grant a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waldock v. Adkins, 1916 OK 415, 156 P. 1192, 57 Okla. 103, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 484 (Okla. 1916).

1916 OK 415 (Waldock v. Adkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.