Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Waldock, Et Ux. v. Iba

Waldock, Et Ux. v. Iba

153 So. 915, 114 Fla. 786
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 10, 1933·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.
Insofar as the facts and the law and its application are concerned they are in nowise materially unlike those involved in the case of Murray, et al., v. Newsom, as Liquidator, in which opinion was filed in this Court on June 27th, 1933.

Therefore, the law as enunciated in that case rules this and the decree here appealed from should be reversed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that case. *Page 787

It is so ordered.

Reversed.

WHITFIELD, P. J., and BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waldock, Et Ux. v. Iba, 153 So. 915, 114 Fla. 786 (Fla. 1933).

153 So. 915 (Waldock, Et Ux. v. Iba) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seminole County v. M.G. Investments of Orlando, Inc.
714 So. 2d 1066 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
In Re Thymewood Apartments, Ltd.
123 B.R. 969 (S.D. Ohio, 1991)
City of Gainesville v. Charter Leasing Corp.
483 So. 2d 465 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
SOUTHERN COLONIAL MORTG. v. Medeiros
347 So. 2d 736 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
United of Fla., Inc. v. ILLINI FED. S. & L. ASS'N
341 So. 2d 793 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Martyn v. FIRST FED. SAV. & L. ASS'N OF W. PALM BEACH
257 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Martyn v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
257 So. 2d 576 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Dade County v. Priest
31 Fla. Supp. 134 (Miami-Dade County Circuit Court, 1968)
United States v. Bernard E. Roessling, Etc.
280 F.2d 933 (Fifth Circuit, 1960)
Shavers v. Duval County
73 So. 2d 684 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1954)
Lafferty v. Detwiler
20 So. 2d 338 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)