Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Waldo v. State

Waldo v. State

781 So. 2d 1198, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5526, 2001 WL 418569
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 25, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-3012
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 781 So. 2d 1198 (Waldo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waldo v. State, 781 So. 2d 1198, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5526, 2001 WL 418569 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The State correctly concedes that the trial court erred in failing to appoint counsel to represent defendant, Larry Waldo, at his resentencing hearing. Resentencing is a critical stage in which a defendant has the right to be present and has the right to have the assistance of counsel. See Chestnut v. State, 578 So.2d 27 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); Woodson v. State, 111 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). Accordingly, we vacate the sentences and remand for resen-tencing.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duhart v. State
858 So. 2d 1222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
781 So. 2d 1198, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5526, 2001 WL 418569, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waldo-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.