Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Waldo v. P. W. Tully's Woodstock Stud, Inc.

Waldo v. P. W. Tully's Woodstock Stud, Inc.

202 A.D.2d 945, 610 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3087
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 31, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 A.D.2d 945 (Waldo v. P. W. Tully's Woodstock Stud, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waldo v. P. W. Tully's Woodstock Stud, Inc., 202 A.D.2d 945, 610 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3087 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Casey, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Torraca, J.), entered January 20, 1993 in Sullivan County, which granted defendants’ motion to amend their answer.

Plaintiff contends that Supreme Court erred in granting defendants’ motion to amend the answer to plead the Statute of Limitations. In the absence of any claim of surprise or prejudice by plaintiff, we conclude that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion (see, Fahey v County of Ontario, 44 NY2d 934; Kramer & Sons v Facilities Dev. Corp., 135 AD2d 942; Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Sheldon, 124 AD2d 428).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Weiss and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mushatt v. Tompkins Community Hospital
228 A.D.2d 925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 A.D.2d 945, 610 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waldo-v-p-w-tullys-woodstock-stud-inc-nyappdiv-1994.