Waldner v. Equitable Loan Soc.
Opinion
The sole question is whether the preferred stock is entitled to cumulative dividends. Par. 4 of the charter construed under the rules of Delaware law would make such stock carry the attribute of a cumulative dividend. See Garrett v. Edge Moor Iron Co., 22 Del.Ch. 142, 194 A. 15, affirmed sub nom. Pennsylvania Co. for Insurance on Lives, etc., v. Cox, 23 Del.Ch. 193, 199 A. 671, and cases therein cited. Further than that, the evidence at the hearing was abundant to show the acts of the officers, directors and stockholders over a long period of time disclose the construction they placed on the meaning of the contract, found in paragraph 4 of the charter, between the preferred and common stockholders inter sese. At the first meeting of, the incorporators on January 22, 1910 a resolution was passed approving the form of the preferred stock certificates. These certificates since then and up to the present have always borne the legend that the dividends on such shares were to be “cumulative.”
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
60 F. Supp. 372 (Waldner v. Equitable Loan Soc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.