Waldman v. Sakow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Waldman v. Sakow

65 A.D.2d 540, 409 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13144

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 24, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 65 A.D.2d 540 (Waldman v. Sakow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waldman v. Sakow, 65 A.D.2d 540, 409 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 9, 1978, unanimously dismissed, with $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal to plaintiffs-respondents. Special Term’s order memorializing its rulings on questions propounded of defendant Sakow during the course of his examination before trial is not appealable. (Lee v Chemway Corp., 20 AD2d 266; Tri-State Pipe Lines v Sinclair Refining Co., 26 AD2d 285; Klein v Schneiderman, 58 AD2d 763; see 7 Weinstein-KornMiller, NY Civ Prac, par 5701.17.) Even if we were to reach the merits, we would affirm Special Term’s rulings. Plaintiff’s motion to have this appeal reached in the October Term is unanimously denied, without costs or disbursements, as academic. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Fein and Sullivan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 9, 1978, unanimously dismissed, with $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal to plaintiffs-respondents. Special Term’s order memorializing its rulings on questions propounded of defendant Sakow during the course of his examination before trial is not appealable. (Lee v Chemway Corp., 20 AD2d 266; Tri-State Pipe Lines v Sinclair Refining Co., 26 AD2d 285; Klein v Schneiderman, 58 AD2d 763; see 7 Weinstein-KornMiller, NY Civ Prac, par 5701.17.) Even if we were to reach the merits, we would affirm Special Term’s rulings. Plaintiff’s motion to have this appeal reached in the October Term is unanimously denied, without costs or disbursements, as academic. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Lupiano, Fein and Sullivan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.2d 540, 409 N.Y.S.2d 656, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waldman-v-sakow-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack