Waldman v. Medical Protective Co. of Fort Wayne
This text of 235 A.D. 857 (Waldman v. Medical Protective Co. of Fort Wayne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out the first separate defense affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We are of opinion that the defense is sufficient in law (Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Vogel, 232 Fed. 337), and that in the absence of sufficient evidence from the plaintiff from which may be found a valid acceptance of the policy before the date of the claimed cancellation, the defense would be complete. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waldman-v-medical-protective-co-of-fort-wayne-nyappdiv-1932.