Waldheim v. Sonnenstrahl

27 N.Y.S. 1133, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 873
City of New York Municipal Court·Decided February 8, 1894·Published

Opinion

FITZSIMONS, J.

The plaintiff’s testimony certainly shows that he failed* to comply with the covenant in the guaranty, which provided that defendant should be notified, by postal card, if Ginns did not pay five dollars each week, on account of the goods sold; but the testimony also shows that defendant,, after Ginn’s default, waived that provision; therefore, the judgment was-* right, and must be affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waldheim v. Sonnenstrahl, 27 N.Y.S. 1133, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 873 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

27 N.Y.S. 1133 (Waldheim v. Sonnenstrahl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.