Waldene Realty Co. v. Pfalzer
This text of 223 A.D. 787 (Waldene Realty Co. v. Pfalzer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[788]*788Judgment of the County Court of Nassau county reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff for $170, with interest and costs. The defense of an eviction was waived by reason of the tenant’s continuing in possession and paying the rent during August and September. (Merida Realty Co. v. Coffin, 123 N. Y. Supp. 120.) The evidence does not disclose an untenantable condition subsequent to a few days after July 26, 1926. (Ernst v. Wheatley, 93 N. Y. Supp. 1116.) In view of this disposition of the case, the appeal from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
223 A.D. 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waldene-realty-co-v-pfalzer-nyappdiv-1928.