Waldene Realty Co. v. Pfalzer

223 A.D. 787
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1928·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[788] Judgment of the County Court of Nassau county reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff for $170, with interest and costs. The defense of an eviction was waived by reason of the tenant’s continuing in possession and paying the rent during August and September. (Merida Realty Co. v. Coffin, 123 N. Y. Supp. 120.) The evidence does not disclose an untenantable condition subsequent to a few days after July 26, 1926. (Ernst v. Wheatley, 93 N. Y. Supp. 1116.) In view of this disposition of the case, the appeal from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is dismissed. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waldene Realty Co. v. Pfalzer, 223 A.D. 787 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1928).

223 A.D. 787 (Waldene Realty Co. v. Pfalzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bet Construction Corp. v. City of New York
96 Misc. 2d 1102 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
Heissenbuttel v. Comnas
14 Misc. 2d 509 (New York County Courts, 1958)
Merritt v. Tague
23 P.2d 340 (Montana Supreme Court, 1933)